Comparison of Kernel equating methods under NEAT and NEC designs

dc.authorid0000-0002-5432-7338en_US
dc.contributor.authorÖzsoy, Şeyma Nur
dc.contributor.authorKilmen, Sevilay
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-22T10:21:49Z
dc.date.available2023-08-22T10:21:49Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, Kernel test equating methods were compared under NEAT and NEC designs. In NEAT design, Kernel post-stratification and chain equating methods taking into account optimal and large bandwidths were compared. In the NEC design, gender and/or computer/tablet use was considered as a covariate, and Kernel test equating methods were performed by using these covariates and considering bandwidths. The study shows that, in the NEAT design, Kernel chain equating methods exhibit higher error than the post-stratification equating methods do since the lowest error in the NEC design was obtained from the Kernel equating method with large bandwidth through the computer/tablet variable. Kernel test equating results based on the NEC design, which considers gender and computer tablet use variables as a covariate separately, showed lower SEE than that of the NEC pattern, which takes these variables together as covariates. In terms of the bandwidth, when all methods are compared within the pattern used (i.e., NEAT and NEC), it has been seen that generally Kernel test equating with large bandwidth results in fewer errors than the Kernel test equating with optimal bandwidth. When the NEAT and NEC designs are compared generally, the NEAT design has a lower SEE than that of the NEC design.en_US
dc.identifier.citationÖzsoy, Ş. N., & Kilmen, S. (2023). Comparison of Kernel equating methods under NEAT and NEC designs. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(1), 56-75.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.21449/ijate.981367
dc.identifier.endpage75en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-7456
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage56en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1161624en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21449/ijate.981367
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/11590
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000958387300004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.institutionauthorKilmen, Sevilay
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIjate-Int Journal Assessment Tools Educationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Assessment Tools In Educationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTest Equatingen_US
dc.subjectKernel Equatingen_US
dc.subjectNEAT Designen_US
dc.subjectNEC Designen_US
dc.subjectBandwidthen_US
dc.subjectComputer Tablet Use Variablesen_US
dc.titleComparison of Kernel equating methods under NEAT and NEC designsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
seyma-nur-özsoy.pdf
Boyut:
1.03 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: