Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin ve Hemşirelerin Bakıma İlişkin Tutum ve Davranışları
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2019
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç: Bu araştırma, hemşirelik öğrencileri ve hemşirelerin hemşirelik bakımına ilişkin tutum ve davranışlarını belirlemek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Yöntem: Araştırma tanımlayıcı olarak yapılmıştır. Veriler araştırmaya katılmaya gönüllü olan, bir üniversite hastanesinde görev yapan 101 hemşire ve bir sağlık yüksekokulunda okuyan 227 hemşirelik öğrencisinden elde edilmiştir. Araştırma verileri kişisel bilgi formu ve Bakım Odaklı Hemşire-Hasta Etkileşimi Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde tanımlayıcı istatistikler, Bağımsız İki Örnek t-Testi, Tek Yönlü Varyans Analizi, Mann-Whitney U Testi ve Kruskal Wallis H Testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Hemşirelerin bakım odaklı hemşire hasta etkileşimi ölçeği önemlilik, yeterlilik ve uygulanabilirlik boyutu puan ortalaması sırasıyla 299.33±38.65; 284.56±38.94; 267.73± 50.21’dir. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin bakım odaklı hemşire hasta etkileşimi ölçeği önemlilik, yeterlilik ve uygulanabilirlik boyutu puan ortalaması sırasıyla 314.92±37.28; 276.78±40.40; 277.81±47.09’dir. Hemşirelik öğrencileri ve hemşirelerin önemlilik boyutu puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı bir fark olduğu belirlenmiştir (p<.05). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin cinsiyete göre bakım odaklı hemşire-hasta etkileşimi ölçeği puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı fark belirlenmemiş olup (p>.05), sınıf düzeyine göre ise önemlilik ve uygulanabilirlik boyutları toplam puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmiştir (p<.05). Hemşirelerin cinsiyet, eğitim düzeyi ve mesleki kıdemine göre bakım odaklı hemşire-hasta etkileşimi ölçeği puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı fark bulunamamıştır (p>.05). Sonuç: Araştırma sonucunda, hemşire ve öğrenci hemşirelerin bakım odaklı hemşire hasta etkileşimine yönelik tutum ve algılarının olumlu yönde olduğu, öğrenci hemşirelerin bakım odaklı hasta-hemşire ilişkisini hemşirelere göre daha önemli olarak algıladıkları saptanmıştır.
Aim: This study was conducted to determine the attitudes and behaviors of nurses and student nurses regarding nursing care. Method: A descriptive model was used in the study. The data were obtained from 101 nurses working in a university hospital and 227 nursing students studying in a health school, who volunteered to participate in the research. Research data were collected using a personal information form and the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale. Descriptive statistics, Independent Samples T-Test, One Way Anova, Mann-Whitney U Test and Kruskal Wallis H-Test were used in the data analysis. Results: The nurses’ mean scores from the “importance”, “competence” and “feasibility” subscales of the caring nurse-patient interaction scale were 299.33 ± 38.65, 284.56 ± 38.94, and 267.73±50.21, respectively. The student nurses’ mean scores from the “importance”, “competence” and “feasibility” subscales of the caring nurse-patient interaction scale were 314.92 ± 37.28, 276.78 ± 40.40, and 277.81 ± 47.09, respectively. It was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the importance subscale of nursing students and nurses (p<.05). There was no significant difference between nursing students’ average of caring nurse-patient interaction scale scores according to gender (p>.05). Significant differences were found between the mean of the total scores of importance and competence dimensions by class level (p<.05). In addition, no significant difference was found between nurses’ average of caring nurse-patient interaction scale scores according to gender, education level and working duration (p>.05). Conclusion: It was determined that the attitudes and perceptions of nurses and student nurses regarding caring nurse-patient interaction were positive and that student nurses perceived the caring nurse-patient relationship as more important when compared to the perceptions of nurses.
Aim: This study was conducted to determine the attitudes and behaviors of nurses and student nurses regarding nursing care. Method: A descriptive model was used in the study. The data were obtained from 101 nurses working in a university hospital and 227 nursing students studying in a health school, who volunteered to participate in the research. Research data were collected using a personal information form and the Caring Nurse-Patient Interaction Scale. Descriptive statistics, Independent Samples T-Test, One Way Anova, Mann-Whitney U Test and Kruskal Wallis H-Test were used in the data analysis. Results: The nurses’ mean scores from the “importance”, “competence” and “feasibility” subscales of the caring nurse-patient interaction scale were 299.33 ± 38.65, 284.56 ± 38.94, and 267.73±50.21, respectively. The student nurses’ mean scores from the “importance”, “competence” and “feasibility” subscales of the caring nurse-patient interaction scale were 314.92 ± 37.28, 276.78 ± 40.40, and 277.81 ± 47.09, respectively. It was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the mean scores of the importance subscale of nursing students and nurses (p<.05). There was no significant difference between nursing students’ average of caring nurse-patient interaction scale scores according to gender (p>.05). Significant differences were found between the mean of the total scores of importance and competence dimensions by class level (p<.05). In addition, no significant difference was found between nurses’ average of caring nurse-patient interaction scale scores according to gender, education level and working duration (p>.05). Conclusion: It was determined that the attitudes and perceptions of nurses and student nurses regarding caring nurse-patient interaction were positive and that student nurses perceived the caring nurse-patient relationship as more important when compared to the perceptions of nurses.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Davranış Bilimleri, Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları, Hemşirelik
Kaynak
Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
10
Sayı
4
