Bolu’da çalışan hekimlerin ötanaziye yaklaşımı
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2006
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Dünyada bir çok boyutuyla tartışılan ve 2002 yılında Hollanda’da uygulamaya konan ötanazi ülkemizde henüz tartışma gündeminde yerini almamıştır. Ülkemiz hekimlerinin ötanaziye yaklaşımını ortaya koymak için yapılan araştırmaların bir basamağı niteliğinde olan araştırmamızda; Bolu’da çalışan hekimlerin ötanazi ile ilgili beklentileri ve yaklaşımlarının ortaya konması amaçlanmıştır. Anket çalışmamızda Bolu’da çalışan %61’i uzman, %39’u pratisyen olan 70 hekimin ötanazi konusundan haberlilikleri ve ötanaziye bakışlarını ölçmek için hazırlanmış olan 15 soruya verdikleri yanıtlar SPSS programında değerlendirilmiştir. Ankette yer alan “Ölümcül, acı verici bir hastalığa yakalanmış, bilinci kaybolmuş bir hastada ötanazi kararını kim vermelidir?” sorusunda hekimlerin %46,4’ü bu kararı hastanın ailesi ve hekiminin verebileceği yönünde görüş belirtmiştir. Hekimlerin %33,3’ü ötanazinin ülkemizde yasak da olsa gizlice uygulandığına inandığını ve %82.9’u bu konunun ülkemizde tartışılmasının yararlı olduğunu belirtmiştir. Ötanazide ülkemize en uygun yaklaşımın belirlenmesi için öncelikle koşullarımızın ve konuyla ilgili taraflara ait verilerin ortaya konması gereklidir.
Euthanasia, which had been a very serious issue for the world to discuss, had legality in Holland in 2002, has not even taken euthanasia as an important issue for the current discussions in our country. The aim of this research was to reveal the opinion and expectations of the physicians working in Bolu about euthanasia. It can be regarded as one of the steps for the series of researches to determine the approach of the Turkish physicians for euthanasia. Of the 70 physicians, 61 % were specialists and 39 % were general practitioners. who work in Bolu were included to the research. They asked to reply a questionnaire including 15 questions with multiple choices. The answers of the questionnaire had been evaluated by the SPSS program. To the question, “Who should decide the euthanasia for an unconscious patient with fatal and painful disease?”, 46.4 % of the physicians replied that the patient’s family and the physician should decide on the euthanasia. 33.3 % of the physicians stated to believe that euthanasia being applied secretly although not allowed by law in our country. 82.9 % of them stated that euthanasia should have been a discussion issue currently. To determine the most appropriate approach for euthanasia in our country, all the individual data should be collected on the subject basis and national conditions should be taken into account.
Euthanasia, which had been a very serious issue for the world to discuss, had legality in Holland in 2002, has not even taken euthanasia as an important issue for the current discussions in our country. The aim of this research was to reveal the opinion and expectations of the physicians working in Bolu about euthanasia. It can be regarded as one of the steps for the series of researches to determine the approach of the Turkish physicians for euthanasia. Of the 70 physicians, 61 % were specialists and 39 % were general practitioners. who work in Bolu were included to the research. They asked to reply a questionnaire including 15 questions with multiple choices. The answers of the questionnaire had been evaluated by the SPSS program. To the question, “Who should decide the euthanasia for an unconscious patient with fatal and painful disease?”, 46.4 % of the physicians replied that the patient’s family and the physician should decide on the euthanasia. 33.3 % of the physicians stated to believe that euthanasia being applied secretly although not allowed by law in our country. 82.9 % of them stated that euthanasia should have been a discussion issue currently. To determine the most appropriate approach for euthanasia in our country, all the individual data should be collected on the subject basis and national conditions should be taken into account.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Tıbbi Etik
Kaynak
Adli Bilimler Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
5
Sayı
1
