Demirci, FuatYücel, Oğuz2021-06-232021-06-2320010932-0067https://doi.org/10.1007/s004040000159https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/4601We compared morbidity and success rate of pubovaginal sling with Burch colposuspension operations in Type I/type II genuine stress urinary incontinence (GSI). The study included patients who had no preoperative detrusor instability (DI), no recurrent GSI, no severe pelvic prolapsus and whose Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) values were higher than 90 cm water. Twenty three of free-rectus fascial sling and 23 of Burch colposuspension operations were performed randomly on the patients by a single surgeon. There was no statistical difference between patients in terms of age, BMI, parity, number of daily pads used and preoperative bladder neck mobility. Operation time, change in hematocrit, spontaneous voiding time, length of hospitalization and urinary infection were not different in 2 procedures. 17 patients from both groups could be compared after one year. The bladder neck mobility of both groups were similar. One surgical failure, 1 DI, 1 severe cystocele and 1 enterocele were found in the Burch group while only 1 DI was found in the pubovaginal sling group. When pubovaginal sling operation was performed as the primary surgery on the patients with type I/II GSI, the morbidity, complications and 1 year success rate are the same as Burch procedure.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessBladder Neck HypermobilityBurch ColposuspensionPerineal UltrasonographyPubovaginal SlingStress urinary IncontinenceArticle10.1007/s0040400001592654190194117897432-s2.0-0035200014Q2