Acar, EmrahGüneş, Yılmazİzgi, İbrahim AkınKırma, Cevat2024-07-222024-07-222023Acar, E., Güneş, Y., İzgi, İ. A., & Kırma, C. (2023). Reply to Letter to the Editor:“Pros and Cons of a Novel Coronary Stenting Technique for Medina 0.0. 1 Lesions: Osdokina Crush”. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, 27(9), 554.2149-22632149-2271http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3541https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12260To the Editor, We would like to express our gratitude to the authors for carefully reading and analyzing our case report.1 One of the most intriguing lesions in terms of percutaneous coronary interventions carried out in coronary bifurcation lesions is Medina 0.0.1 or isolated ostial side branch (SB) lesions.2 Percutaneous coronary interventions techniques for Medina 0.0.1 lesions are generally divided into 2 categories in the literature: those that involve stenting the ostial lesion and those that involve balloon angioplasty with atherectomy on the ostial lesion.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessProvisional T Stenting TechniqueDrug-Eluted Balloon (DEBNapkin EffectLetter27955455537487230Q3WOS:001080315700011Q3