İnce, Ömer BarışKalkan, RamazanÇakır, Serkan2021-06-232021-06-2320161792-2720https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8960https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000385013900004https://doi.org/10.12681/jhvms.15621The study was conducted using two ELISA methods-the liquid phase blocking ELISA (LPBE) and solid phase competition ELISA (SPCE) for the detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) serotype A- and O-specific antibodies of different cattle breeds in Turkey. These methods were compared in 426 cattle previously vaccinated with oil-adjuvanted bivalent vaccine as well as in sera from 40 cattle with no history of foot-and-mouth disease infection or vaccination. The results were found that SPCE had a better specificity (serotype A; 100% and serotype O; 97.50%) than LPBE (serotype A 95.00% and serotype O 92.50%). Sensitivity of SPCE had also better values (serotype A; 99.30% and serotype O; 98.59%) than LPBE (serotype A; 97.89% and serotype O; 96.48%). The results of the present study showed that the SPCE method is more reliable than LPBE.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessFoot-and-Mouth DiseaseLiquid-Phase Blocking ELISASolid-Phase Competition ELISAArticle10.12681/jhvms.1562167133382-s2.0-84990209764Q3WOS:000385013900004Q4