Comparison of fully automatic analyzer and manual measurement methods in sperm analysis and clinical affect

dc.contributor.authorYis, Özgür Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T20:18:24Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T20:18:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To investigate the clinical effect of the computer-aided sperm analyzers (CASA) by comparing the low sperm concentration semen samples evaluated by CASA with the sperm count performed on Makler Counting Chamber (MC) as a manual method.Methods: Semen samples were taken from184 patients coming to our clinic were evaluated with CASA (SQA-V Gold sperm analyzer, MES Medical Electronic Systems Ltd. Caesarea Industrial Park, IL 3088900, UK) and MC (Makler Counting Chamber, Sefi-Medical Instruments ltd., Haifa, Israel). Samples were divided into two groups as samples containing sperms and samples without sperms, according to the CASA results.Results: There was a very high correlation between the two measurement methods (rho = 0.982) and regression analysis formula was y=1.042x-0.104. No sperm was detected in CASA in any of the samples identified to have no sperm in MC. However, when patients who were identified with no sperm in their CASA measurements (n=51) were analyzed with MC, 29 patient samples (56.9%) had an average of 0.23±0.35 x106 /mL sperm.Conclusion: CASA’s used in routine semen analysis provide a great convenience in measuring sperm count, compared to manual methods and provide highly correlated results. Manual verification of samples can be recommended since the samples diagnosed with azoospermia provided different results with a manual method in our study.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.30714/j-ebr.2020463605
dc.identifier.endpage230en_US
dc.identifier.issn2618-6454
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage224en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid411777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.30714/j-ebr.2020463605
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/411777
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/15654
dc.identifier.volume3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofExperimental Biomedical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.titleComparison of fully automatic analyzer and manual measurement methods in sperm analysis and clinical affecten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar