Effect of Different Polymerization Times on the Microhardness and Intrapulpal Temperature of Glass Ionomers

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKaynar, Zeynep Buket
dc.contributor.authorDalkiliç, Evrim Eligüzeloğlu
dc.contributor.authorDönmez, Nazmiye
dc.contributor.authorKazak, Mağrur
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T20:16:58Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T20:16:58Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the microhardness of high viscosity glass ionomer, glass carbomer (GC) and bioactive restorative material (BRM) exposed to different polymerization times, and the intrapulpal thermal changes they caused on teeth. Methods: Sixty human molar teeth were used in this study. During Class I cavity preparation,1 mm dentine thickness was left between the pulp chamber and occlusal cavity floor.Teeth were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1: restored with high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HV-GIC), cured for 20 sec., Group 2: restored with HV-GIC, cured for 40sec., Group 3: restored with conventional glass ionomer cement, cured for 60 sec., Group 4: restored with GC and cured for 90 sec., Group 5: restored with BRMs, cured for 20 sec., Group 6: restored with BRM, cured for 40 sec. All glass ionomer cements were polymerized with a LED light curing unit except GC groups. GC groups were cured with a special thermocure lamp. As soon as the materials were placed in the cavities, temperature increase on the tooth during setting/ polymerization reactions were measured with a thermocouple wire connected to a data logger. All of the specimens were polished with discs.Then, microhardness values were evaluated from three different points. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey test and paired t-tests (p<0.05). Results: Group 2 showed statistically significantly higher increase in temperature when compared to Group 1. Group 4 showed statistically significantly higher temperature than Group 3. There was no significant difference between Groups 5 and 6 in terms of temperature changes. The highest microhardness values were obtained in GC groups, when the groups were compared to each other. Group 2 showed significantly higher microhardness value than Group 1. Group 6 showed significantly higher microhardness values than Group 5. Conclusion: Fourty sec polymerization of the BRM positively affected the microhardness without causing an intrapulpal temperature increase. While high microhardness values were obtained in 90 sec polymerization of GC, it also caused an increase in temperature that would damage the pulp.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14235/bas.galenos.2023.03016
dc.identifier.endpage355en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-2373
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage349en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1257034en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14235/bas.galenos.2023.03016
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1257034
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/15321
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBezmiâlem Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectGlass-ionomeren_US
dc.subjectmicrohardnessen_US
dc.subjectintrapulpalen_US
dc.subjectbioactiveen_US
dc.subjectcarbomeren_US
dc.titleEffect of Different Polymerization Times on the Microhardness and Intrapulpal Temperature of Glass Ionomersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu