BATI FELSEFESİ BAĞLAMINDA SCHOPENHAUER'A GÖRE AKIL VE HAKİKAT
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2016
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Kadim dönemlerden bu yana insanoğlunun sergilediği felsefi çabanın altında, her şeyi kuşatan gerçeğin bilgisine ulaşma isteği olduğu iddia edilebilir. Bu nedenle, insanın, etrafını saran değişim ve çokluğu izah edebilmek için tarih süreci gerçeği içerisinde felsefi bir çabada bulunduğu söylenebilir. Ortaçağ sonrası Batı düşünce tarihinde, bu çaba ilk olarak, birbirine indirgenemeyen ( madde ve ruh) iki töz çerçevesinde Descartes'in tutarlı bir şekilde izah etme yöneliminde görülebilir. Fakat süreç içerisinde birbirine indirgenemeyen bu iki tözün onları kuşatan tek bir hakikat çerçevesinde izah edilip edilmeyeceği tartışma konusu olmuştur. Schopenhauer da bu sorunun çözümü için çaba sarf etmiştir ve bu nedenle de irade metafiziğine başvurmuştur. Ona göre nesne dünyasında itibar içermeyen hiçbir şey yoktur. Bu nedenle her şeyi kuşatan gerçeğin, itibar içermeyen insanın "ben" tecrübesine dayandırılması gerekmektedir. Ayrıca ona göre insanın kendisini sürekli olarak isteyen bir varlık olarak tecrübe etmesi de göz önüne alındığında her şeyi kuşatan metafizik unsurun "irade" olduğu söylenebilir. İrade hem aklı hem nesneyi aşan bir gerçeklik olduğu dikkate alındığında Schopenhauer düşüncesinin, batı felsefesi açısından farklı bir noktaya konulması gerektiği söylenebilir. Bu nedenle makelemizde Schopenhauer'in irade düşüncesi akıl ve nesne ile ilişki içerisinde ele alınacaktır. Ayrıca Schopenhauer'a ait hakikat ve akla yönelik yaklaşımın batı düşünce sürecinde farklı bir noktaya da denk geldiği gösterilmeye çalışılacaktır.
It can be argued that there is the desire to reach to knowledge of the truth encompassing all things under the philosophy effort. It can be said that in order to reach to explain of transformation surrounding the people around and multiplicity, human has approached for many explanations throughout the history. The history of Western thought has tried to explain coherently this fact in the framework of two essences, substance and spirit, which are irreducible to each other since Descartes. However, in the process, it has become a subject of the discussion whether these two essences in the framework of a single truth surrounding them would be explained or not. The reason for this is constantly ignored in favor of the other one because of irreducible aspects of spirit and substance each other in the process of thinking. Arthur S. in order to solve this problem appealed for willpower. According to him, there is nothing, which has not esteem in the object world. Therefore, the truth surrounding everything should be based on that human being who are lack of esteem is able to experience himself as an unconditional individual. In addition, as considered that human being is to experince himself as an entity constantly desiring himself, it can be also argued that metaphysical element surrounding everthing is willpower. Because willpower is a reality exceeding both mind and object, it is clear that thought of Arthur S. should be dealt with from a different viewpoint in terms of Western philosophy. In this article, the willpower thought of Arthur S. is to dealt with concerning the relationship between mind and object. Besides, approach to reason and truth in the thought of Schopenhauer, it's demonstrated equal to different point.
It can be argued that there is the desire to reach to knowledge of the truth encompassing all things under the philosophy effort. It can be said that in order to reach to explain of transformation surrounding the people around and multiplicity, human has approached for many explanations throughout the history. The history of Western thought has tried to explain coherently this fact in the framework of two essences, substance and spirit, which are irreducible to each other since Descartes. However, in the process, it has become a subject of the discussion whether these two essences in the framework of a single truth surrounding them would be explained or not. The reason for this is constantly ignored in favor of the other one because of irreducible aspects of spirit and substance each other in the process of thinking. Arthur S. in order to solve this problem appealed for willpower. According to him, there is nothing, which has not esteem in the object world. Therefore, the truth surrounding everything should be based on that human being who are lack of esteem is able to experience himself as an unconditional individual. In addition, as considered that human being is to experince himself as an entity constantly desiring himself, it can be also argued that metaphysical element surrounding everthing is willpower. Because willpower is a reality exceeding both mind and object, it is clear that thought of Arthur S. should be dealt with from a different viewpoint in terms of Western philosophy. In this article, the willpower thought of Arthur S. is to dealt with concerning the relationship between mind and object. Besides, approach to reason and truth in the thought of Schopenhauer, it's demonstrated equal to different point.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
[No Keywords]
Kaynak
Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
16
Sayı
1